In Python 3, write a decorator function that has the following property:

1. The name of the decorator is uppercase and takes a function as input.
2. The decorator has an inner function called wrapper with no input argument.
3. The wrapper function has two local variables: original and modified.
4. The input function argument of decorator gets assigned to the original variable inside the wrapper function and the upper case version of the input function gets assigned to the modified variable.
5. The wrapper function returns the modified variable.
6. The decorator returns the wrapper (per the usual of the inner functions in decorators)
7. Write a new function called greetings that prints "Hello".
8. Decorate the greetings function with the uppercase decorator function.
9. Run the program by invoking the greetings function. Record the output and include it with your code.
10. Save the decorator uppercase as a separate Python file and import it to a new file that defines the greetings function as a decorated function that simply prints the "Hello" message.
11. Generate the output by invoking the greetings function.

(1)correct answer is d.the others are just bad syntax.by using the keyword "new" and int[] together, you create a new integer array object in memory. whenever you want to create an object without using array literals, you must use new. (by array literals, i mean a line of declaration code like int[] x = {4,6}; where you literally specify an array without using new. an array literal can only be used in the same line as declaring the array.)(2)correct answer is c. it is the only choice that returns an array and properly takes in an array reference as an argument.choices a and b do not return an array; they respectively return void (nothing at all) and a primitive double, which is not a double array.choice d has invalid syntax. looking at it, it won't properly accept any array reference you pass into the method.(3)correct answer is a.x is already defined.choice b only returns an index of the array.also, in any other method, you wouldn't write the type next to the thing being returned. choices c and d are invalid.(4)correct answer is c.choice a only accepts one.choice b requires at least two numbers.choice d only takes in an integer array reference, not integers.(5) correct choice is d.by specifying that the first argument can take in any number of ints, java will assume everything you input into the method will be an integer.theoretically it will never reach that string argument, no matter how many commas you put. this is illegal; the java compiler will complain. i don't think it'll even recognize it as a method header.