Gian's parents have noted that he seems to have a hard time socially relating to his peers as he cannot seem to understand other people's perspectives. Gian fails to make eye contact during conversation and very poorly responds to changes to routine. Which of the following might his parents be concerned about? A. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
B. Tourette's disorder
C. Specific learning disability
D. Autism spectrum disorder
E. Intellectual disability

In article v of the united states constitution, the amendment process is explained. why did the framers include provisions for amending the constitution? a) to limit the individual liberties of american citizens b) to allow the constitution to adapt to future circumstances c) to allow the president to change the constitution as needed eliminate d) to ensure that state governments had more power than the nation

Dr. redbull conducts a study to determine whether her new energy drink children perform better on spelling tests. she randomly assigns children to one of two groups: group 1 receives her energy drink and group 2 receives water. she then gives both groups a spelling test and compares the results. which of the following is true about this study? a. group 1 is the dependent variable and group 2 is the independent variable. b. this is a correlational study. c. group 2 is the experimental group. d. the independent variable is the type of drink the children receive.

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.