subject
Social Studies, 17.12.2021 18:10 isabelperez063

Consider the example of 21 voters, which are split in three groups depending on their preferences over these candidates: Number of voters
(6) (7) (8)
First Choice
b
c
a
Second Choice
c b b
Third Choice
a a c

a) Suppose voters are asked to cast a vote for their top candidate only. Who is the winner? Is the result the 'best' choice from a social point of view? That is, does the winner best capture the voters' preferences? Provide an argumentation of your answer.
b) Which candidate will be selected by majority voting? Justify your answer.
c) What is the outcome under the Borda voting system? What is wrong with the Borda rule? Justify your answer.
d) Suppose that the group of the 7 voters after some deliberation change their minds about how to order their two least favourite candidates. So instead of preferring b to a, they now prefer a to b. So we have the following preferences over the candidates a, b, c (consider the table below). Find the new winner with plurality scoring, majority and Borda systems. Comment the results.

Number of voters
(6) (7) (8)
First Choice
b
c
a
Second Choice
c a b
Third Choice
a b c

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 21:30
Who established the peoples republic of china in 1949
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 05:00
In at least two paragraphs, discuss the differences between the principles of republicanism and democracy. explain whether you think the united states is more of a republic or a democracy. refer to at least one example from the constitution. (10 points)
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:50
Astudy that involves interviews of adults is eligible for expedited review. the researcher wants to add an adolescent population (aged 12 to 17) to the study and has designed a parental permission and assent process. no additional changes are planned. which of the following statements about review of the revised protocol is accurate? the research would only be eligible for expedited review if the adolescents are capable of understanding the same consent forms used for the adult population.the research would only be eligible for expedited review if the adolescents have been declared to be emancipated minors.the new research would need full review by a convened irb because children are a protected population.unless the nature of the questions would raise the level of risk to > minimal for adolescents, the research would still qualify for expedited review.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 12:00
Does (flavius) josephus believe the romans were merciful when they conquered people? how does he try to persuade the reader to support his belief?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Consider the example of 21 voters, which are split in three groups depending on their preferences ov...
Questions
question
World Languages, 19.06.2020 17:57
question
Mathematics, 19.06.2020 17:57
question
Mathematics, 19.06.2020 17:57
Questions on the website: 13722367