You find you need to meet with someone who was acting aggressive and domineering in the last meeting you facilitated. What are the best tactics for addressing this behavior?
a. Pretend you have a low opinion of the other participants, to garner the person's trust.
b. Remain focused on the ground rules and the meeting objectives.
c. Dominate the person, so he see what it's like.
d. Warn her you will not hesitate to kick her out during the meeting, if needed.

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )

given all the practice it takes to become proficient at writing up ncoer's, , awards, and conselings as well as learning how to become a well rounded   leader , and managing different types of people

answer; randomization;

c. making citizens of the states also citizens of the union. apex g'