In Renaissance Italy, art was paid for by a system of patronage. Typically a wealthy patron (customer) would ask an artist for a particular work on a particular subject, and then pay the artist until the work was completed. Sometimes patrons would have the artist move into their home and pay them for a series of works. Based on the passage, what conclusion can be drawn about the art of the Renaissance?
A.
It was designed to appeal to wealthy members of society.
B.
Patrons spent very little on their artists or their work.
C.
It was designed to appeal to all members of society.
D.
Artists had absolute freedom when creating art works.

panem is a communist totalitarian dictatorship where all the resources and how they are allocated belongs to the capitol. the districts exist only to provide goods and services for the capital and most of the citizens live in poverty. it is a police state where the "peacekeepers" use force and threats to keep the people under control. dissent is outlawed and those who disobey the law are executed, flogged, or turned into avoxes. the games are another means in which the ruling elite in the capitol exert their power over the districts. when reading the books i drew parallels between panem and the soviet union and north korea. in no way is panem capitalist. the people in the capitol are wealthy but the majority of them are involved in the government somehow. it was the same way in the former soviet union where bigwigs in the communist party and high ranking government officials were given access to goods, services, medical treatments not available to the general public. if you think panem has a capitalist economy you need to brush up on your economics.  

all of them? if not search it up