Social Studies, 24.01.2021 16:50 ezellcarly

Please help me to give answer

Answers: 2

Show answers

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 04:30

What is the relationship between surface winds in the northern and southern hemisphere?

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 18:00

In the construction of a new housing development which factor of production can be categorized as land?

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30

Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 15:00

Norman jones, an economic historian at the university of utah, has described the views of the ancient greek philosopher aristotle on interest: aristotle defined money as a good that was consumed by use. unlike houses and fields, which are not destroyed by use, money must be spent to be used. there- fore, as we cannot rent food, so we cannot rent money. moreover, money does not reproduce. a house or a flock can produce new value by use, so it is not unreasonable to ask for a return on their use. money, being barren, should not, therefore, be expected to produce excess value. thus, interest is unnatural. what did aristotle mean in arguing that money is â€śbarrenâ€ť? why would money being barren mean that lenders should not charge interest on loans? do you agree with aristotleâ€™s reasoning? briefly explain.

Answers: 2

Answer

You know the right answer?

Please help me to give answer...

Questions