Should policy analysts and policymakers try to deal wit the fundamental causes of social problems such as crime, poverty, or homelessness, or aim instead for a more pragmatic and limited approach that may be more realistic and more politically acceptable? Why do you think so?

I think they should try to deal wit the fundamental causes of social problems.

Explanation:you can deal with an issue in as practical and real way as you can but if the causes are not dealt with, this will mean the issue will come back and keep coming back no matter how hard you deal with it. Only if you tackle the cause of these problems you can then be assured that their effect are likely to decrease.

this is an outline for the decisions that frankie is going to make

opportunity cost

willingness to buy

price or quality

of course, there could be many economic strategies that should be considered important while making decision. opportunity cost is the foremost significant factor while considering any economic option. when you buy something, you should know how much you are forgoing for this product. indeed, you could buy something different with this measure if you changed your mind. willingness to buy shows how much surplus you are earning while making a decision. it is important because it shows you buy what you want or you buy because you have only limited amount of money. the price or quality can be considered as a general economic option that we are applying while buying something. when you buy something, price or quality could be one of the options. indeed, they define the characteristics of the product.    

mark brainliest!

raliegh, north ! hope this