How is it that two different scientist can make similar observations about a scientific investigation of phenomena and yet come up with different inferences

Because, regardless of what the observation was, the different testing methods were used and by different scientists there are different types of method, and what more, as people are different, will be different experiences, and this will result in Different results, because everyone has different views, scientists would not be different.

This may be because the two scientists experimented with different methodologies.

Explanation:

As we know, through the scientific method, a scientific conclusion only occurs after a few steps, the first being observation, which is the stage in which the scientist observes a particular matter or phenomenon. Two different scientists may make the same observation about a phenomenon, but that does not mean that their experiments would be the same and bring the same conclusions.

After observation, scientists may adopt entirely different methodologies to pursue their scientific experiments. The methodology directly interferes with the conclusion, so two different scientists can make similar observations about a scientific investigation of phenomena and yet present different inferences.

what is the answer

male citizens in athens could vote on all the decisions that affected the city and serve on juries. however, democracy was not open to everyone. citizen women and children were not allowed to vote. slaves and foreigners living in athens (known as metics) were banned from participating in government.