Which factor does the supreme courts generally consider especially important when deciding which cases to review?

a. whether the uncial restraint played a role in cases initial ruling
b. whether the law being challenged originated in congress or a state legislature
c. whether lower courts have issued conflicting rulings in similar cases
d. whether the case involves a criminal or civil matter

The supreme courts generally consider the factor especially important when deciding whether lower courts have issued conflicting rulings in similar cases

Option C

Explanation:

In the customary law convention, courts choose the law material to a case by deciphering resolutions and applying the point of reference, which records how and why earlier cases have been chosen.

In contrast to most thoughtful law frameworks, customary law frameworks pursue the tenet of gaze decisis, by which most courts are bound by their own past choices in comparative cases, and all the lower courts should settle on choices predictable with past choices of higher courts.

For instance, in England, the High Court and the Court of Appeal are each bound by their own past choices. However, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom can stray from its prior choices, in spite of the fact, that practically speaking it once in a while does as such.

this question is confusing, could you reword it?

explanation:

i believe the answer is:   psychological  experiment

in this experiment, wilhelm wundt became the first person that implement scientific method in analyzing the pyschological phenomenon.

due to this result, wilhelm wundt also able to make psychology to be acknowledged as a separate scientific field from biology.