Which of these offers the best explanation regarding the effects of plessy v. ferguson (1896)

The Plessy v. Ferguson was a decision of the U.S. Supreme Court to upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation also known as "separate but equal", it legitimized many state laws that had been passed in the South to re-establish racial segregation. Despite being regarded as one of the worst decisions in U.S. Supreme Court history, it has never been explicitly overruled.

It set “separate but equal” as a legal precedent ruling given in Plessy versus Ferguson.

Further Explanation:  

Plessy versus Ferguson is the case on 18th May 1896. Supreme Court of the USA maintained isolationism on racial grounds. The President of separate but equal. The constitutionality of segregation on racial grounds. This case enquired definition of the 14th amendment and the equal protection clause. The case over with the other case of the Supreme Court that is brown versus board of education of Topeka in 1954. Was influenced by French, which store toleration towards people of other color stool Louisiana separate car act. Many laws made by the state. Plessy was in “Octoroon”. Octoroon was a person of 7-8th whites and 1-8th black ancestry. Octoroon was from New Orleans, who violated the separate act. The lawyer of  Plessy defended him by saying that the law was made unconstitutional. He lost the case and he appealed to the Supreme Court of USA. Supreme Court by 7-1 majority decided that the law of Louisiana did not violate the 14th amendment. The fact that there is equality among white and black Americans both in legal terms. It eliminated all social distinctions which were earlier based on colour. The state legislature of America made laws on health and safety to determine police powers. John Marshall said that the Constitution of USA is colour blind.

Learn More:

1.Two practical solutions on how youth risk behavior can be prevented.

2.Impact of risk behavior social-economic physical and emotional.

Answer Details:

Grade: High School

Chapter: Plessy versus Ferguson

Subject: Social Science

Keywords:

18 May 1896, isolationism, separate but equal, constitutionality, 14th amendment, equal protection, Octoroon, Louisiana separate car act.

question - in 1827, john walker, a druggist in a small english town, tipped a splint with sulphur, chlorate of potash, and sulphid of antimony, and rubbed it on sandpaper, and it burst into flame. the druggist had discovered the first friction-chemical match, the kind we use to-day. it is called friction-chemical because it is made by mixing certain chemicals together and rubbing them. although walker's match did not require the bottle of acid, nevertheless it was not a good one. it could be lighted only by hard rubbing, and it sputtered and threw fire in all directions. in a few years, however, phosphorus was substituted on the tip for antimony, and the change worked wonders. the match could now be lighted with very little rubbing, and it was no longer necessary to have sandpaper upon which to rub it. it would ignite when rubbed on any dry surface, and there was no longer any sputtering. this was the phosphorus match, the match with which we are so familiar. according the paragraph what was the benefit of the new phosphorus match? it burst into flame when rubbed on sandpaper. it was made by mixing chemicals. it could be ignited on any dry surface. it threw fire in all directions.

answer - matches required natural chemicals