A psychic claims he can predict one year in advance whether a given movie star will win an Oscar. In the previous five years, he's successfully predicted 75% of the Oscar winners. Some Hollywood insiders claim he's actually privy to a group that's been rigging the Oscars, and it's your job to investigate this.

Do you think the psychic's predictions are impressive? Why or why not?

How would you go about calculating a P-value for his record, what kind of data would you need to calculate the value, and how low a P-value would you need to reject the hypothesis that the psychic's accuracy is due to chance alone?

28

step-by-step explanation:

because that's the answer

we have the parent function given by,

1. the function is translated 5 units to the left.

so, we get,   becomes

2. the function is translated 5 units to the right.

so, we get,   becomes

3. the function is translated 5 units upwards.

so, we get,   becomes

4. the function is translated 5 units downwards.

so, we get,   becomes

5. the function is reflected across x-axis.

so, we get,   becomes

6. the function is reflected across y-axis.

so, we get,   becomes .

step-by-step explanation:

mark brainliest.

a) 0,0; 1,1; and 2,2

step-by-step explanation:

these have the exact same coordinates, thus they are the correct function.