Company a makes a large shipment to company b. company b can reject the shipment if they can conclude that the proportion of defective items in the shipment is larger than 0.1. in a sample of 400 items from the shipment, company b finds that 55 are defective. conduct the appropriate hypothesis test for company b using a 0.05 level of significance.

a) what are the appropriate hypotheses?

a)h0: μ = 0.1 versus ha: μ > 0.1

b)h0: p = 0.1 versus ha: p > 0.1

c)h0: p = 0.1 versus ha: p ≠ 0.1

d)h0: p = 0.1 versus ha: p < 0.1

b) what is the test statistic? give your answer to four decimal places.

c) what is the critical point for the test? give your answer to four decimal places.

d) what is the appropriate conclusion?

a)fail to reject the claim that the defective proportion in the shipment is 0.1 because the test statistic is smaller than the critical point.

b)conclude that the defective proportion in the shipment is greater than 0.1 because the test statistic is smaller than the critical point.

c)conclude that the defective proportion in the shipment is greater than 0.1 because the test statistic is larger than the critical point.

d)fail to reject the claim that the defective proportion in the shipment is 0.1 because the test statistic is larger than the critical point.

50 min

step-by-step explanation:

they will be decreasing both their times in half

60 / 2 = 30

40/2 = 20

30 + 20 = 50

is should be y = 5x

step-by-step explanation:

correct me if im wrong

the results from a pre-test for students for the year 2000 and the year 2010 are illustrated in the box plot. what do these results tell us about how students performed on the 29 question pre-test for the two years?

if we compare only the lowest and highest scores between the two years, we might conclude that the students in 2010 did better than the students in 2010. this conclusion seems to follow since the lowest score of 8 in 2010 is greater in value than the lowest score of 6 in 2000. also, the highest score of 28 in 2010 is greater in value than the highest score of 27 in 2000.

but the box portion of the illustration gives us more detailed information. the middle bar in each box shows us that the median score of 20 in 2000 is greater in value than the median score of 17 in 2010. further, we note that the box and whiskers divide the illustration into four pieces. each of these four pieces represents the same portion of students. so, the upper half of the students in 2000 scored in the same score range as the upper one-fourth of the students in 2010, see the illustration at a score of 20.

by considering the upper one-fourth, upper half, and upper three-fourths instead of just the lowest and highest scores, we would conclude that the students as a whole did much better in 2000 than in 2010. we would conclude that as a whole the students in 2010 are less prepared than the students in 2000.

in this section, we discuss box-and-whisker plots and the five key values used in constructing a box-and-whisker plot. the key values are called a five-number summary, which consists of the minimum, first quartile, median, third quartile, and maximum.

step-by-step explanation: