Alight bulb distributor was given a study from an led bulb manufacturer showing that led light bulbs are better for the environment than traditional bulbs. is there an incentive for this study to be biased? why or why not?

no, because neither company benefits from the survey results.

no, because the light bulb distributor trusts the led bulb manufacturer.

yes, because the led bulb manufacturer may benefit from the survey results.

yes, because the light bulb distributor wants to become a "green" company.

C. Yes, because the LED bulb manufacturer may benefit from the survey results.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that,

'An LED bulb manufacturer gives the study with the result that LED light bulbs are better for the environment than the traditional bulbs'.

Now, if the light bulb distributor further shows the result to the consumers, they would like to buy LED bulbs.

So, the demand for the LED bulbs would increase. For that, the distributor would have to order more LED bulbs from the manufacturer.

Thus, the supply of LED bulbs would increase for the manufacturer resulting in increase in revenue.

Hence, the LED manufacturer may benefit from the survey result.

you forgot the options, but i found them anyways, the correct answer is "john wilson believes that words and actions based on the intellect are superior to those based on emotions".

john wilson is depicted as an extremely intelligent man. the point of the excerpt is to make a sort of distinction between emotional and rational intelligence. he happens to have both attributes, but he clearly favors his intellectual gifts. at the same time, because of his religious background, he's a little bit conflicted with this and it makes him ashamed.

hope this !