Which accurately describes how humanist philosophy and the renaissance impacted the social and economic structure of europe?   peasants revolted against the tyranny imposed by monarchs, resulting in the crusades, which lasted 200 years peasants were no longer bound to the rigid social structure of feudalism, enabled more economic opportunities agriculture was no longer seen as a viable economic opportunity and peasants left the farm to earn money as artisans humanist philosophy favored a feudalistic society in which peasants were forced into poverty and loyalty to their nobles

it was certainly a debatable decision, mainly because it was based primarily on political - and not on legal or social - views. since the congress at that time was led by members of the republican party, and the territory that the tribes wanted to turn into an exclusively indian state was predominantly democratic, the proposal (as expressed in the constitution) did not succeed, but the constitution itself proved to be of crucial importance in the creation of the state of oklahoma, and, most importantly, it guaranteed the involvement of representatives of the indian tribes in the government of the future joint state.  

as a member of congress, i would have voted to ratify the constitution, or at least to have it tabled. ignoring it was an interested and partial decision.  

the romans were initially interested in expansion via sicily (which at that time was a cultural melting pot), part of which lay under carthaginian control. at the start of the first punic war (264-241 bc), carthage was the dominant power of the western mediterranean, with an extensive maritime empire