How would a secondary source be beneficial to a historian studying a particular event?

One of the most important reasons why a historian might benefit from a secondary source when studying a particular event is because the use of a secondary source allows the historian to avoid the need to look back at the primary source. This is because an expert has already studied it, and published it, so that other historians can rely on it. In this way, a lot of money and effort can be saved.

to reform the distraught soviet union, the democratization of the communist party was promoted through party secretary mikhail gorbachev's policies of “perestroika” and “glasnost.” perestroika refers to the reconstruction of the political and economic system established by the communist party.

1. temperance, abolitionist, suffragist