subject
History, 31.01.2020 11:59 daltonbrown4

In 1832, the united states supreme court ruled in worcester v. georgia that the state of georgia had no right to force the cherokee from their native lands. why did this ruling have little positive effect? georgia had no interest in cherokee lands. president jackson did not enforce the ruling. the cherokee nation chose to move to canada. the trail of tears had already occurred.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 22:30
What is the relationship of the letters n.y.l> w.c to the new york infirmary for women and children
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 03:00
At the end of civil war, which reconstruction plan called for a military occupation of the south ? a. lincoln's b. radical's c. johnson's
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 05:20
How does eurydice slipping back into the underworld support the theme
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 11:00
Why were some framers in favor of incorporating the bill of rights? a. because then the bill of rights would cover both state and federal law.b. because then the bill of rights would protect both citizens and non citizens.c. because the the framers would only have to follow the federal laws.d. because the the framers would only have to follow their state's laws
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
In 1832, the united states supreme court ruled in worcester v. georgia that the state of georgia had...
Questions
question
Chemistry, 27.05.2021 20:30
question
Social Studies, 27.05.2021 20:30
question
Mathematics, 27.05.2021 20:30
question
History, 27.05.2021 20:30
question
Social Studies, 27.05.2021 20:30
Questions on the website: 13722362