According to the virginia and kentucky resolutions, how should states respond to federal laws they considered unconstitutional?
a. by refusing to enforce them
b. by rewriting them
c. by challenging them in court
d. by petitioning the president

The correct answer is A) By refusing to enforce them.

This concept of refusing to following federal laws that a state interprets as unconstitutional is known as nullificiation. Even though this concept has never gained legal validity in court, it has been used multiple times throughout US History to justify actions taken by states who refuse to follow the federal governments orders. Another example of this would be the Nullification Crisis of 1832 in which Southern states (like South Carolina) refuse to follow the tariff established by the US Congress.

the discoverers and explorers: 1. natives showed jedediah smith the way. 2. william sublette was the first cross it with a caravan. 3.joel walker and his family were the frist settlers to use it. the jumping off point: 1. founded in 1827 near where the missouri river flows into the mississippi. 2. by the 1840's, it was the most popular "jumping off" point for pioneers to stock their wagons with supplies. 3. missionaries from the church of jesus christ of latter day saints attempted to make independence their zion, or holy capital. the route west: 1. the first emigrants to oregon came by ship before the trail was established. 2. ships continued to to travel to oregon even after the overland migrations began, but they were not popular among the pioneers. 3. the fare for a sea journey to oregon was quite expensive--few pioneer families could afford it. i don't know the other three i'm sorry.

what are the choices btw if it was me id say the lack of money to continue with education