Question 2 (worth 3 points)
(mc)the table below shows the number of immigrants to the united states from different regions of europe between 1871 and 1910:
european immigration
northern/western europe southern/eastern europe
1871 - 1890 5,850,689 1,160,906
1891 - 1910 3,554,313 8,244,864
which statement explains the trend shown in this table?
during the late 1800s, there was a decrease in industrial growth and fewer job opportunities in the united states.- wrong
in the late 1800s, immigration laws were more lenient than immigration laws passed during the early 1900s.
in the late 1800s and early 1900s, the u. s. government passed restrictions on immigration from northern and western europe.
during the late 1800s and early 1900s, there was extreme poverty or religious and political persecution in southern and eastern europe.

electricity

so thats all folks

1- in bradbury's  fahrenheit 451, all books are banned and burned upon discovery. in the nazi germany, books considered to be subversive to the regime would be burned to keep the population from generating ideologies that could challenge nazism.

2- was bradbury correct in his literal interpretation of  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.”? in some way, yes. when knowledge is not only limited, but also controlled, the people tied to it are led to their demise. just like in the novel, people in nazi germany who owned  subversive books were punished not only by the burning of their property, but also by the discrimination that followed after such a public form of consequence. if a person was seen being confiscated  subversive  books, they may be considered as an ally to the jews, which meant pretty much the same as being the enemy back then. because of the extreme exclusion and suffering that followed this punishment, it's almost like dying a slow death.

in this way, the phrase  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.” is both literal and figurative.

explanation:

mark brainliest and have a great day!