The Supreme Court opposed Andrew Jackson's Indian removal policies by: A. arguing that American Indians were legally U. S. citizens.
B. ruling that the Five Civilized Tribes should become a new state.
C. claiming that treaties signed by American Indians were illegal.
D. ruling that the states could not take American Indian lands..

C. claiming that treaties signed by American Indians were illegal.

Explanation:

americans had many intangible advantages. well since the british fought a war far from home military orders, troops, and supplies sometimes took months to reach their destinations, and the british had an extremely difficult objective. they had to persuade the americans to give up their claims of independence, americans had a grand cause: fighting for their rights, their independence and their liberty. this cause is much more just than waging a war to deny independence.

apartheid, (afrikaans: “apartness”) policy that governed relations between south africa's white minority and nonwhite majority and sanctioned racial segregation and political and economic discrimination against nonwhites. people should not get this wrong. i was just answering a question.