Did america need to be an imperial nation?

Explanation:

to insure that Americans were not excluded. Although this goal sometimes required acquisition of islands, since bases were needed both for trade and for the exercise of political and military influence, it did not require assumption of larger administrative responsibilities. Americans, by their competitive superiority, could achieve economic dominance without taking on such burdens.” In other words, May argues that the main reason why American imperialism did not take the form of conquering and holding land was that there was that cost-benefit analysis would provide more profit if the nations in question retained political autonomy yet opened their borders to trade with America. It is simply more advantageous for a capitalist society to secure the flow of trade (by breaking down barriers and raising our own tariffs as seen fit) rather than to secure land; the latter was indeed the mentality of a feudalistic society, the claiming of earth for little more than just that. It has long been a tradition of American historians to prove that American intentions are not imperialistic.

four sitting presidents have been assassinated while in office but the first was abraham lincoln,

due to inefficiency of management, the business plan has failed

idk what right product means but i assume it's this one since this was the last one left after i did the other three

the finance team has misjudged the requirement of business plan and chosen a wrong line of credit

operations risk is when the employees make a mistake

flash floods have damaged all machinery in the main manufacturing

natural disasters include anything ruined in the business by the weather or other disasters such as earthquakes

there have been foreign exchange rate fluctuations

economic risks is when things in the economy changes (like interest rates, currency value). the government has a large part in controlling this