Andrew Jackson was different from Thomas Jefferson in what way?
A. Jackson strongly opposed the concept and use of nullification.
B. Jackson saw and promoted himself as a man of the people.
C. His policies supported the contributions of American Indians.
D. Jackson avoided using the power of the veto during his era.
E. Jackson did not oppose slavery.

I believe the correct answer for this is A. Jackson strongly opposed the concept and use of nullification.

Explanation:

Jefferson was the one who set forth the idea of nullification while Jackson was strongly opposed to this idea, so that is why I think it is A.

Yes, Jackson saw himself as a "common man" who tried to make a government for the people, but Jefferson accepted this thought, so it is NOT B.

It is NOT C because Jackson did not support anything from the Indians. He wanted them gone. One definition of contribution is the part played by a person or thing in bringing about a result or helping something to advance. Jackson did not want to help them advance. Jefferson was the one who was more for Indians. He wanted them to assimilate and become US citizens.

It is NOT D because it's just not true. He did veto things. One example is that he vetoed the bill to reauthorize the Bank. Jefferson was the one that did not veto anything.

And lastly, it is NOT E because while Jackson did not oppose slavery, Jefferson had slaves himself, so this is true, but it is not what we're looking for.

~Kicho [nm68]

i'll tell you everything i know

explanation:

the american entry into world war i came in april 1917, after more than two and a half years of efforts by president woodrow wilson to keep the united states out of the war.

apart from an anglophile element urging early support for the british, american public opinion reflected that of the president: the sentiment for neutrality was particularly strong among irish americans, german americans, and scandinavian americans, as well as among church leaders and among women in general. on the other hand, even before world war i had broken out, american opinion had been more negative toward germany than toward any other country in europe. over time, especially after reports of atrocities in belgium in 1914 and following the sinking of the passenger liner rms lusitania in 1915, american citizens increasingly came to see germany as the aggressor in europe.

wilson, as president, made virtually all the key decisions over foreign policy. while the country was at peace american banks made huge loans to britain and france, which were used mainly to buy munitions, raw materials, and food from across the atlantic. until 1917, wilson made minimal preparations for a land war and kept the united states army on a small peacetime footing, despite increasing demands for enhanced preparedness. he did, however, expand the united states navy.

in 1917, with russia experiencing political upheaval, and with britain and france low on credit, germany appeared to have the upper hand in europe, while the ottoman empire, germany's ally, held on to its territory in modern-day iraq, syria and israel. at this point germany decided to resume unrestricted submarine warfare. its goal was to starve britain into surrender, although it realized that this would almost certainly bring the united states into the war. germany also made a secret offer to mexico regain territories lost in the mexican–american war in an encoded telegram known as the zimmerman telegram, which was intercepted by british intelligence. publication of that communique outraged americans just as german u-boats started sinking american merchant ships in the north atlantic. wilson then asked congress for "a war to end all wars" that would "make the world safe for democracy", and congress voted to declare war on germany on april 6, 1917.

on december 7, 1917, the u.s. declared war on austria-hungary.

u.s. troops began arriving on the western front in large numbers in 1918.

i hope this uwu