subject
History, 05.05.2020 03:39 Hoeing3195

9. Why would many isolationists have argued that the Neutrality Act of 1939 was not actually "neutral"?

1.They thought the Neutrality Act was supporting the Soviet Union.

2.They thought material support of the Allies was, indirectly, acting against the Axis Powers.

3.They thought the Neutrality Act limited attention to domestic issues.

4.They equated foreign alliances with an increased chance of war.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 17:00
Apoet can make powerful, but subtle statements a) overstatement b) irony c) paradox d) understatement
Answers: 2
question
History, 21.06.2019 17:30
What were the 3 points of hamiltons banking plan
Answers: 2
question
History, 21.06.2019 22:30
How is the president involved in the process of bills becoming laws?
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:10
Are first amendment rights guaranteed in every situation? a. yes, because protecting civil liberties was one of the most important values to the founders of this country b. no, because sometimes the government limits individual freedoms for the benefit of the public as a whole. c. no, because people have to earn their first amendment rights by behaving in a responsible way. d. yes, because the first amendment is part of the constitution, which is the basis for all law and government.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
9. Why would many isolationists have argued that the Neutrality Act of 1939 was not actually "neutra...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722363