What distinguishes a totalitarian government from a fascist one?
a. fascism is a form of totalitarianism that involves extreme nationalism and warlike foreign policy.
b. totalitarianism involves unlimited government control, but fascism takes into account the opinions of the people.
c. totalitarianism is an offshoot of fascism that strictly promotes communist beliefs and practices.
d. fascism is brought about in response to economic crisis, but totalitarianism operates during prosperity.

A. Fascism is a form of totalitarianism that involves extreme nationalism and warlike foreign policy

Explanation:

The totalitarian governments are governments where a single person, or a small group of very powerful people control everything in the country. There is no institution that has power to confront the leader/s, thus they absolute power. The fascism is a type of totalitarianism, but unlike most of the totalitarian governments, the fascism is based on nationalism and aggressive foreign policy. This leads to open aggression inside the country toward the ethnic minorities in order to create an ethnically pure nation, as well as attacking the other nations and be very aggressive toward them.

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is

what are you options