Can someone plz me i dont understand how to do this.
here is the statement- some historians have argued that the articles of confederation created an ineffective government.
it says i have to do this -contextualization: how can you place your argument into the broader historical context? in other words, describe how anything that occurs before, during, or continuing after the time frame of the question is relevant to your argument.
idk how to do that so can some plz me out

there were three types of british colonies: royal, proprietary, and self-governing. each type had its own characteristics. proprietary colonies, such as pennsylvania, maryland, and delaware, were basically land grants from the british government.

hope this : )

b) they want the land taken away from the wealthy landowners and given to peasants.

when studying cause and effect, historians usually group the causes into different categories. for example, cultural causes reflect how a society’s literature and art convey the way the society saw itself in relation to the rest of the world. another resource that historians use to understand society is pop culture, which tells them the trends and ideas that are preferred by the common people. when studying cause and effect, it’s important to remember multiple causation, or the idea that an effect could have several causes and vice versa.  

the correct option is “cultural causes” since art and literature are related to the culture of a place. culture is determined by literature, art, music.

the correct option is “pop culture” since it reflects the likes and ideas of common people whereas the rest of the options do not focus on common people.  

the correct option is “multiple causation” since it refers to the idea that events are caused by multiple reasons, not just a single one.