1. in which of these ways was the warsaw pact useful to the soviet union? a. it's member nations could influence the development of a reconstructed germany b. it's authority could be invoked to quell revolts in soviet satellite nations c. it's member nations could benefit from favorable trade relationships with the usd. it's military strength could provide a balance of power against chinese threats 2. which policy or initiative contributed most to the nuclear arms race between the united states and the soviet union? a. marshall planb. mutually assured destruction c. truman doctrine d. detente 3. despite the "balance of terror," why did people stoll fear nuclear war? a. the superpowers continued to develop new nuclear weaponsb. the superpowers had entered into detentec. mutually assured destruction was inevitable d. head to head conflict between the superpowers never happened4. how w

1. b. it's authority could be invoked to quell revolts in soviet satellite nations.

The Warsaw Pact was a defense treaty that was signed in Warsaw, Poland between the Soviet Union and seven of the Eastern Bloc satellite states of Europe. This was a significant development during the Cold War. One of the purposes of the Warsaw Pact was to maintain Soviet control of military forces in Central and Eastern Europe.

2. b. mutually assured destruction.

Mutually assured destruction is a military doctrine in which the full-scale use of nuclear weapons by two or more opposing sides would cause the annihilation of both the attacker and the defender. This means that the threat of using weapons against the enemy prevents the enemy's use of the same weapons.

3. a. the superpowers continued to develop new nuclear weapons.

The fact that both super powers continued developing nuclear weapons throughout the Cold War meant that, even when relationships improved and a  balance was reached, people continued to fear nuclear war.

a change of venue is the legal term for moving a trial to a new location. a change of venue request because venue is improper means that the removing defendant believes that the case may not be in that venue because it is improper under procedural rules.

well let's see i know a little about the fall of the roman empore but what to say i do not have a clue of what to say. (that's 28 words) i learned about it in social studies it was quite boring really my teacher talks a lot, like a lot then gives us a bunch of work sheets not too many though.( that's 60 words)i actually almost fell asleep in class of course i really like that teacher of course she is really nice. i actually don't remember much from that class i got a b without any notes (it was an open notes test)(that's 95 words) i'm wasting time but i've gone too far to stop now i'm sorry i haven't said really any thing on the topic at all sorry not sorry haha jk.(that's 125 words ) (mike drop)