subject
History, 15.07.2019 11:30 jabezslade22

The decision in the arizona v. california case was significant because it a. allowed states to take water when they wanted from the colorado river. b. denied water sharing right to arizona based on population results. c. determined that california needed more water due to its sizable produce industry. d. stated lower basin states could use water from tributaries as needed before that water entered the colorado river.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 21:30
The clergy comprised the wealthy first estate, with members of noble descent in particular having a great deal of power. what was the score of the clergy’s wealth
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 03:00
How well does america today live up to the ideals of the declaration of independence?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 03:30
What is the relation between the hover dam and the gold rush
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 05:00
Which statement about submarine use in world war i is true? the allies never found a way to counter german submarine warfare. germany’s use of submarines affected the united states’ decision to enter the war. only the germans used submarines in world war i.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
The decision in the arizona v. california case was significant because it a. allowed states to take...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722363