How can personal biases and points of view influence historians when they are studying evidence?

Personal biases and points of view can often influence historians when they are studying evidence. This is because historians with a particular bias will initially approach the information with a certain preconceived idea. This idea could affect the way they look at the event and the conclusions they draw from it. Eventually, this could lead historians to very different interpretations of an event.

i think it's a)sparta

answer; i believe that the correct answer is,lies(political rhetoric);