do you think it was fair to prohibit churches from conducting Easter sermons together? give four reasons​

I do not think it was the churches should have been prohibit from conducting Easter sermons.

The Easter sermons could have been broadcast via Satellite, Radio, and Television to the adherents of the faith without increasing the health risk during the 2020 pandemic lock-down.

The reasons that I do not support the prohibition are as follows:

Thus, there was no need to prohibit churches from conducting Easter sermons together.

Learn more about Easter sermons at here:

Yes, I do really believe that churches holding Easter sermons together ought to be prohibited.

1.  Why do we celebrate Jesus' resurrection? He seemed to prefer that we live out his resurrection by feeding and mending the world around us, based on his teaching. Would the humble Christ have desired the establishment of such an elevated, costly religious effort in his honor? Easter church rituals appear to be a rehash of everything Christ neglected during his earthly ministry.

2.  Avoid unnecessary tension. Rather than getting the entire family dressed up for church, sitting among strangers, and then having little time to speak with your friends following the service, you may just go to a movie. The sound system and special effects will very certainly be superior to those at your church.

3.  What, therefore, was the benefit of Christ's death and resurrection? I think it was an illustration of God's enormous, unconditional love for everybody. Why not celebrate this by extending this love to the world around us, which can be accomplished in an infinite number of personal ways, rather than isolating ourselves from the world through a religious tradition or church division?

4.  Why spend time dwelling on death? When someone we love dies, we do not mourn their passing. instead, we remember the individual or commemorate the memories of when they were alive.

lets g

i think its d, but grammarly says none

explanation: