Refer to the Newsela article "Alas, Shakespeare Won't Be Taught in This Class." Why does the author include the section "Romeo and Juliet in Another Class"?

to highlight the reasons that Shakespeare should remain a part of high school English classes

to explain the specific changes teachers can make to Shakespeare's plays to modernize them

to convince readers that Shakespeare's works can only be enjoyed if they are performed, not read

to provide an example of one teacher's efforts to make Shakespeare more relatable to students

to provide an example of one teacher's efforts to make Shakespeare more relatable to students.

Explanation:

The aforementioned article is based on the opinion of a high school teacher named Dana Dusbiber in Sacramento who does not believe that teaching Shakespeare in this day and age is still relevant due to the world increasingly accepting other cultures.

The author then wrote this section in the article to show the exam of Christine Baker who is also a Sacramento High School teacher who holds the belief that Shakespeare might be old-fashioned, but it shouldn't be scrapped. It should be modernized because the lessons still apply to the present period.

in macbeth, banquo, who in real life had willing in the murder of king duncan, is portrayed as a loyal subject of the king himself. many analysts believe that shakespeare had done this in order to king james, who supposedly was a direct descendant of banquo himself.

hope this ! : )