Energy and Temperature Activity Worksheet Instructions: Follow the directions below to complete part one and part two of this activity. You will submit both parts once completed. Note: You are not performing the experiment—only designing it. Introduction The purpose of this assignment is to design an experiment that another student could follow and use to test whether land or water heats faster. You will complete the following: Part One: Experimental Design. Plan out an experiment by answering the guiding questions below. Part Two: Design a Lab Report. Write the outline of a lab report so that another student could complete the experiment by using the materials listed below: sand water heat lamps thermometers cups Part One: Experimental Design In this section, you will think about what type of experiment to set up. Remember, you are NOT completing the experiment, only designing it. If you want to review the scientific method first, use this tutorial. Use these guiding questions to help you design the experiment. Answer each question below: What hypothesis will the experiment test? What are the variables? What purpose would the sand serve? What purpose would the water serve? What purpose would the heat lamps serve? What purpose would the thermometers use? How can you use these materials to test whether land or water heats faster? How would you compare whether land or water heats faster? Within a 24-hour period, at what three points should the temperature be taken? Why? What would an effective conclusion need to include? Part Two: Design a Lab Report Once you have designed the experiment, you must write out the instructions so another student could act as the experimenter and follow them. Fill in the following elements of this lab report as described in italics below. Lab Report Objective Explain the purpose of your lab. Procedure List the experiment procedures. Some steps have been filled in for you. You may need to adjust the numbers to match the steps you decide on. Identify the variables. Write out your hypothesis in an if/then format. Gather your materials. Analyze the data. Write your conclusion. Data Analysis Label a data table so that the experimenter can record observations for the sand and water temperatures at various points. Conclusion Explain what the experimenter should include in this section to show how the data proved the hypothesis.

i think the best answer would be d allowing 30 seconds between response would give time for what was already said to sink down in your mind.

yes as the core issue is an ever increasing majority of human workers   will become permanently unemployed as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines inevitably replace more expensive human workers with each passing year.

economic growth now and in the future requires that fewer jobs are created for human workers. this is the desirable inevitable consequence. the automation of the jobs of human workers is the most profitable economically productive activity on the planet.

so as a global society we need to have a plan to deal with this inevitable change.

automation has been, is and will always be a friend to human society if human society on a global basis is prepared to deal with the inevitable consequences.

what is key is that automation killing all jobs is only a matter of when not if.

the real question is can we get past the now invalid assumption that most humans can work for a decent wage going forward.

i spent my working career increasing automation and increasing efficiency. this consequently reduces the hours worked by humans while increasing the output economic goods and services at an ever decreasing price.

why not have ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines create the vast majority of required economic goods and services as opposed to human workers?

why not have most human workers working less and retiring earlier?

there is much more to life than working forever.

fortunately, automation has been going on for decades and will continue as an irreversible process as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines permanently replace more costly human workers.

i write this answer for the people that have an open mind and are not living in the past this is what i feel most effectively deals with the tractable issues that automation creates.

the question at hand is how we deal with automation going forward as a society.

automation is only a threat because society has yet to acknowledge automation is happening let alone effectively a having a plan to address it.

a conservative libertarian free market idea where individuals choose what economic goods and services are produced in the free market as the free market supply will respond to free market demand. this is not a centrally planned communist economy.

it is yes as the core issue is an ever increasing majority of human workers   will become permanently unemployed as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines inevitably replace more expensive human workers with each passing year.

economic growth now and in the future requires that fewer jobs are created for human workers. this is the desirable inevitable consequence. the automation of the jobs of human workers is the most profitable economically productive activity on the planet.

so as a global society we need to have a plan to deal with this inevitable change.

automation has been, is and will always be a friend to human society if human society on a global basis is prepared to deal with the inevitable consequences.

what is key is that automation killing all jobs is only a matter of when not if.

the real question is can we get past the now invalid assumption that most humans can work for a decent wage going forward.

i spent my working career increasing automation and increasing efficiency. this consequently reduces the hours worked by humans while increasing the output economic goods and services at an ever decreasing price.

why not have ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines create the vast majority of required economic goods and services as opposed to human workers?

why not have most human workers working less and retiring earlier?

there is much more to life than working forever.

fortunately, automation has been going on for decades and will continue as an irreversible process as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines permanently replace more costly human workers.

i write this answer for the people that have an open mind and are not living in the past this is what i feel most effectively deals with the tractable issues that automation creates.

the question at hand is how we deal with automation going forward as a society.

automation is only a threat because society has yet to acknowledge automation is happening let alone effectively a having a plan to address it.

a conservative libertarian free market idea where individuals choose what economic goods and services are produced in the free market as the free market supply will respond to free market demand. this is not a centrally planned communist economy.

hope this

  this riddles' answer is library.

  the "leaves" are a reference to the books' pages that the library contains; the branches are a network of libraries that connect multiple libraries' collections, resources, and items in a system of a common database, integrating them; the branches' organization are a useful management tool for coordinating the multiple collections many libraries have.