Evaluate Mills' use of rhetoric in his essay, "On Liberty" Is his use of rhetoric effective in making his case for humanism? Provide evidence from the text as to why or why not. Also, why do you think Mills chose the essay as the best method to convey his ideas? Your answer should be at least 250 words.

Explanation:A Rhetorical Analysis of "On Liberty"

John Stuart Mill, an English philosopher and a political economist, had an important part in forming liberal thought in the 19th century. Mill published his best-known work, _On Liberty,_ in 1859. This foundational book discusses the concept of liberty. It talks about the nature and the limits of the power performed by society over an individual. The book also deals with the freedom of people to engage in whatever they wish as long as it does not harm other persons.

In _On Liberty,_ Mill employs a combination of formal and informal tones by developing complex ideas through many levels of meanings in form of clear expressions. Mill's use of contrasting metaphors in the paragraphs about the way human beings should develop shows both kinds of tone. The author also employs the figurative language to appeal to his intended audience, both the specialists and non-specialists in philosophy.

Mill writes this argument to appeal to the audience who entirely agrees with him. He approaches his thesis by attacking the conservatives as well as the misguided progressives. He refutes any possible opposite idea to his thesis. Mill uses the phrases such as "no one's idea," "no one should assert," "it would be absurd," "nobody denies" in order to confirm the accuracy of what he talks about and show that no other way of thinking can be accurate. Mill purposely uses these literary techniques because he writes for people who agree with him, otherwise, he would make his audience feel uneasy, or even angry.

Mill's intended audience can be specialists or non-specialists in the study of liberty. This can be proved by the author's use of parenthetical phrases and asides in many parts of his essay to clarify and build up the ideas. "Among the works of man, which human life is rightly employed in perfecting and beautifying," Mill states, "[T]he first in importance surely is man himself" (Mill 87). Perfecting and beautifying the works requires knowledge, personal experience, and skill, which a machine never has. By showing that a machine cannot replace a man, Mill infers the comparative worth of human beings and the difference between a man and a machine. From this, Mill demonstrates the precision in his argument. Other parenthetical asides in the essay, such as "the privilege and proper condition of a human being, arrived at the maturity of his faculties, to use and interpret experience…" (Mill 86), or "a tree, which requires to grow and develop itself on all sides" (Mill 87), show Mill's intention to help his audience, especially the non-specialists, to clearly understand the essay. By doing this, he also strengthens the academic tone of the essay to appeal to the specialists in his field.

Mill's figurative language in _On Liberty_ appeals to the imagination of the audience. His metaphors provide common ground for his audience to catalyze comprehension of the topic.

"Human nature is not a machine to be built after a model, and set to do exactly the work prescribed for it, but a tree, which requires growing and developing itself on all sides, according to the tendency of the inward forces which make it a living thing" (Mill 87).

The tree, in order to grow well, must go through various processes of nature. It grows by itself under sufficient environmental conditions, while a machine comes to exist as a man-made product and its work absolutely depends on a user. It has no inward forces and normally requires an outward force from some energy sources to perform. Besides, a tree exists as a complex and continuously growing creature in comparison to a machine, which remains steady and even gets worn out when used. The metaphors show that an individual differs from a machine; he acts like a tree, because of his complexity and his self-development to achieve a higher state of worth as a human being. By living in particular circumstances, or under specific outward forces, an individual, using inward

since he could see color, and nobody else could, he didn't find it fair that everyone else in the utopia couldn't see color but him and the giver : d

it wouldnt be considered cheating as long as you dont copy the answered we give here word from word.

also remember that some online schools have things that can tell if you have copy and pasted anything into your report.