subject
English, 24.04.2020 18:27 chrismcb875

The Sea is calling

I am standing at the edge of the sea
Looking at the blue as far as I can see
The waves that are dancing high and low
I watch the water come to me and go

5. I am standing with my feet on the sand
The soft, cold grains still without demands
I feel them sink a little near my toes
How many are there? Nobody knows

I am standing with my fingertips on the water
10. The roaring surfs hum like nothing else matters
As seagulls hover above me, not too high
I hear their call. I, too, want to fly
Problem:
Which of these is true about the structure of this poem?
The first line in each stanza has the same beat
The repetition creates urgency or need for action
The repetition emphasizes or stresses on an idea
Each line has the same number of syllables for rhythm

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on English

question
English, 22.06.2019 01:10
Ato of . it be a , is as an . it be a ,in - as a . , it be an , is by to as a , , or an .. (s)of : 12345
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 01:30
How does loma cervantes celebrate her culture in “freeway 280”? ?
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 01:30
Create a well-crafted essay of 1-2 pages outlining a likely theory of king tutankhamun’s death at the age of nineteen. your goal is to convince peers your age that this is the most reasonable theory according to the evidence. incorporate the subjunctive and conditional moods within your writing. use the following rubric to guide your writing. remember to check your spelling (by using a spell checker and also against the original text) to ensure the proper spelling of names and places in king tut’s world. reminder: spell checkers are great, but they’re not always right. think about terms specific to egypt or even tutankhamun’s name. a spell checker won’t know if you’re spelling these correctly, so check with the reading to keep consistent. rubric criterion exceptional capable developing beginning points earned ideas & content main claim supporting details sources are cited clear, focused, interesting ideas with appropriate detail, sources are cited evident main idea with some support which may be general or limited, sources are mentioned main idea may be unclear; supporting detail is vague or off topic, some source information used central idea or theme is not stated; supporting detail may be nonexistent, no sources mentioned organization structure (claim/counterclaim) introduction conclusion strong organization; seamless paragraph transitions; effective and engaging intro and conclusion organization is appropriate but conventional; attempt at introduction and conclusion attempts at organization, inappropriate use of lists or bullets; introduction and conclusion are not developed no introduction or conclusion; no clear organizational framework or transitions voice personality sense of audience appropriate to audience; expressive, engaging, sincere voice is appropriate to topic, but inconsistent or dry voice may be inappropriate; writing may seem mechanical writer’s voice is inappropriate or nonexistent word choice precision effectiveness imagery broad range of descriptive words; creative examples, vivid details and images language is functional and appropriate; descriptions may lack detail or be overdone words may be correct but simplistic; no attempt at detail, description, or examples word choice is limited, words are often misused; supporting detail and examples are nonexistent sentence fluency rhythm, flow variety easy flow and rhythm; good variety in length and structure sentences are appropriate but lack variety and length awkward phrasing and structure, similar patterns and choppy language sentences are incomplete or difficult to follow, language is confusing conventions age appropriate spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar strong use of correct conventions; errors are few and minor most writing conventions correct; occasional high profile errors frequent errors; most do not interfere with readability frequent errors interfere with readability
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 04:00
You visit two websites about inventions of the 21st century. one has .edu in the url address and the other has .com. which site is more likely to be credible and why? (6 points) select one: a. the .edu site is more likely to be credible because all .com sites are trying to sell you something. b. the .edu site is more likely to be credible because its domain is a university or other school type. c. the .com site is more likely to be credible because all .edu sites are personal college student blogs. d. the .com site is more likely to be credible because its owners review all the content before publishing.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
The Sea is calling

I am standing at the edge of the sea
Looking at the blue as fa...
Questions
question
History, 26.08.2020 17:01
question
Mathematics, 26.08.2020 17:01
question
Mathematics, 26.08.2020 17:01
question
Mathematics, 26.08.2020 17:01
question
Social Studies, 26.08.2020 17:01
Questions on the website: 13722363