How dose Shakespeare introduce the idea of opposites being the same

Shakespeare often contrasts opposite making them seem like they are but the same option.

Explanation:

He employs this strategy in some of his most famous aphorisms which include 'to be or not to be', and 'fair is foul and foul is fair'.

These statements are comparisons between two diametrically opposite stances which makes an impression that anything is on the table and either of the options will result in the same thing as they are compared directly to each other.

Thus it gives the impression of being the same.

the author is showing that it is the insatisfaction of basic needs that brings about the protests such as the strikes.if workers do not earn enough to buy food and feed their families and themselves in order to continue working, what is the use of working? besides, another message from the author is that of the owners of factories should be worried about ensuring their furure by having a second and third generation of workers in their industries.if they do not hear the workers demands, they will not have any more workers to make their pockets full.

for me, i'd go with (c) satisfied or (b) overjoyed because if you read it a couple of times, it makes since that it is c or b. it can't b (a) angry because booker was never angry about anything. at the end of the paragraph, booker states, "i think there are not many men in our country who have had the privilege of naming themselves in the way that i " i think that sentence kind of gives away the also, some words in the paragraph can also you like for example, "indulged," "calmly," "perplexity," "privilege," and defining words that you don't know, can you understand more of that paragraph and it can also increase your comprehension. : )

i'm really rally sorry if i'm incorrect, but if i'm hope this ! : )