read the passage from an argumentative essay.

many endangered species are currently threatened by climate change. there are some laws already in place, but are they effective enough? anyone with a conscience knows that these creatures deserve the chance to survive without outside threats impeding their survival. i suppose this is a tough decision for lawmakers, but i hope they choose wisely.

which statement best evaluates the claim in the passage?

a) the claim is ineffective because the language used is unclear and the reasoning does not strongly support it.
b) the claim is unsuccessful because most people will not agree with the opinion and reasoning stated in the claim.
c) the claim is logical because it makes sense and the reasoning used to support it is plausible, varied, and effective.

A) The claim is ineffective because the language used is unclear and the reasoning does not strongly support it.

Explanation: The claim presented in the passage is too vague and fails to clearly illustrate the relationship between climate change, endangered species and lawmakers. "Some laws already in place," "survival without external threats" and "tough decision for lawmakers" are some of the phrases that the author introduces in an unclear way, without specifying their meaning.

A. The claim is ineffective because the language used is unclear and the reasoning does not strongly support it.

Explanation:

I just know

from: "the tragedy of julius caesar by william shakespeare: act 1 "

the correct answer is:

act 1 opens with the forum in celebration and ends with it in chaos.

hello,

your answer is a) the metaphor suggests that the poetic themes are serious and dark.

collins is comparing the poem to a dark room. he is suggesting that the poems theme is serious and wants you to understand it. you don't need to understand the poet in order to understand the poem. you also don't need to move around while reading it. he is simply saying the poem has a dark and serious theme.

- i.a -