Kim used to work at "The Big One" accounting firm, and she earned $50,000 a year. She saved her money and has now invested $100,000 in her own firm. Profit is $20,000 a year, which Kim receives as her only compensation. She concludes that this is great because a 20 percent return is much better than the 8 percent she could get in another investment (the opportunity cost of the funds). What is wrong with this line of thinking?

Adrawback of short-term contracting as an alternative to making a component in-house is thata. it is the most-integrated alternative to performing an activity so the principal company has no control over the agent. b. the supplying firm has no incentive to make any transaction-specific investments to increase performance or quality. c. it fails to allow a long planning period that individual market transactions provide. d. the buying firm cannot demand lower prices due to the lack of a competitive bidding process.