A seller entered a contract with a buyer under which the buyer agreed to purchase certain corporate securities for $500,000. The buyer refused to go through with the purchase, contending that the entire transaction was void because of federal securities statutes. The seller thus sold the securities to another party but was able to sell them for only $420,000. The seller filed an action against the buyer in federal district court, alleging that the transaction did not violate federal securities statutes and seeking $80,000 for the buyer's breach of contract. The seller and the buyer are both citizens of the same state. Does the federal court have subject matter jurisdiction over the action

How does cobley connect the ideas of brands and force? what is his point about brands? 2. do consumers act in the ways that they say they do? why or why not? what is the lesson for marketing in this? 3. why do brands need to be careful about not making mistakes? 4. do companies have control over their brands in today's world? why or why not? 5. the video shows how physics can improve marketing. think of a specific insight or idea from a field other than business and discuss how this idea or insight could you as an entrepreneur. entrepreneurship as problem-solving < - your second lab link 1. how did elk become an entrepreneurship? 2. why is problem-solving important in entrepreneurship? 3. do you think you are a problem-solver? why or why not?