An investment opportunity has been identified that will yield a 17% return on investment for each center. The company’s minimum acceptable rate of return is 15%. Which of the following statements is incorrect? A. Sand’s ROI is less than the company’s hurdle rate. B. If each manager is paid a bonus based solely on his ability to exceed the division’s prior period ROI, Sun’s manager would make a decision that is in the company’s "best interest." C. If each manager is paid a bonus based solely on his ability to exceed the division’s prior period ROI, then two of the managers will accept the opportunity. D. Water’s manager is the most effective in terms of generating sales revenue from invested capital. E. If residual income is used to award bonuses, the managers of all three centers will accept the investment opportunity.

Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court.the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center.because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.