Robin and Bellman, both merchants, orally agree to a contract for the sale of $5000 of accessories. Bellman, the buyer, sends to Robin, the seller, a written confirmation of the sale, which is sufficient against Bellman under the statute of frauds and which Bellman signs. Robin fails to perform the contract and does not ship out the goods. Bellman sues. This contract is:

enforceable even without Robin's signature because both parties are merchants.

Explanation:

Enforceable law defines when one person performs legally contract and that party enforce or impose to the other.

Therefore in the given situation, Robin sends the written confirmation of the sale, which was sufficient under the statute of frauds, Bellman signs and Robin fails to send the goods. So, this contract is enforceable because without Robin's signature because both parties are merchants.