Smith entered an oral agreement hiring and authorizing Jones to sell fraudulent identification cards produced by Smith. Smith and Jones orally agreed to share the proceeds from their enterprise. Later, Jones claimed that no enforceable agency relationship was created. Jones is correct because

Explanation:

We have to note an important point here is that, Smith has plan to sell fraudulent identification card through Jones and he has done only Oral agreement.

An oral agreement does not have a proof. Any oral agreement cannot be taken as a proof legally. There must be a proper written agreement required to prove the relationship. There are certain standard too in written agreement.

For Example, agreement written on a normal white paper cannot be accepted. The agreement should be legally signed according the bond paper provided and authorized by the Government.

Considering all the above discussion, Jones stands right.

a dunce cap for you, you assed this 2 weeks ago

i believe the answer is: streets and roads

public property refers to the property that can be used by all legal citizens in a certain country. the public property was created and maintain using the government budget that allocated specifically for it. the budget itself come from the citizen's income tax payment.