When is outsourcing NOT beneficial?
a. when internal control over a particular activity is deemed essential
b. when an activity can be performed better or more cheaply by outside specialists
c. when it improves organizational flexibility and speeds time to market
d. when it reduces the company's risk exposure to changing technology and/or buyer preferences
e. when it allows a company to concentrate on its core business

The correct option is A. when internal control over a particular activity is deemed essential.

Explanation: Outsourcing is the business practice in which there is an agreement between two companies, where company A hires company B to help perform some tasks, oversee operations, or provide services. These activities could range from those that have been previously carried out by company A to a new planned activity, and it could also involve the transfer of employees and assets from company A to company B.

The benefits if outsourcing include:

- helps to focus on core tasks.

- helps to lower costs as more employees need not be hired.

- helps to grant access to a larger talent pool and expertise.

However, one quality of outsourcing is that the hired company gets to exercise a level of control or autonomy, meaning that the hired company was actually hired to oversee a particular activity.

Therefore if an activity now requires the total control of the hiring company, then there would be no need for hiring an outsourcing firm. In this situation therefore, it would be a waste of resources to hire an outsourcing firm, and in summary it would not be beneficial.

the answer would be voluntary exchange -

"the act of buyers and sellers freely and willingly engaging in market transactions. moreover, transactions are made in such a way that both the buyer and the seller are better off after the exchange than before it occurred."

hope this : )

-shy