subject
Business, 06.10.2019 08:30 willveloz4

Outstanding shares from one of its shareholders. the corporation and the shareholder agreed that the corporation would purchase all of the shareholder’s stock at a price of $500,000, payable $100,000 immediately in cash and the balance in four consecutive annual installments. the state’s incorporation statute provides, "a corporation may purchase its own shares only out of earned surplus but the corporation may make no purchase of shares when it is insolvent or when such purchase would make it insolvent." at the time of the repurchase of the shares, the corporation had an earned surplus of $250,000. a. what are the arguments that the repurchase of shares satisfied the incorporation statute? b. what are the arguments that the repurchase of the shares did not satisfy the incorporation statute? c. which argument should prevail?

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 19:20
Sanibel autos inc. merged with its competitor vroom autos inc. this allowed sanibel autos to use its technological competencies along with vroom autos' marketing capabilities to capture a larger market share than what the two entities individually held. what type of integration does this scenario best illustrate? a. vertical b. technological c. horizontal d. perfect
Answers: 2
question
Business, 23.06.2019 08:20
Suppose that a candy maker owns a building and is renting part of the building's space to a doctor. further suppose that because the candy maker is the owner, he has the right to make noise during the day while he makes candy. while the doctor cannot insist on a quiet environment, the doctor could move to a quieter building. however, rent in the next best building is $350/month more than rent in the noisy building. the candy maker can adopt a new technology that eliminates the noise for $275/month. given this situation, can the doctor find a private solution with the candy maker that will make both better off?
Answers: 2
question
Business, 23.06.2019 16:40
Kana is a single wage earner with no dependents and taxable income of $205,000 in 2018. her 2017 taxable income was $155,000 and tax liability was $36,382. kana's 2018 income tax liability: $ kana's minimum required 2018 annual payment necessary to avoid any penalty: $
Answers: 3
question
Business, 24.06.2019 06:00
Aproducer with a comparative advantage has the ability to produce a good or service at__
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Outstanding shares from one of its shareholders. the corporation and the shareholder agreed that the...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 07.04.2020 21:50
question
Mathematics, 07.04.2020 21:51
Questions on the website: 13722363