The following image is a food web in an aquatic ecosystem. what two possible consequences will an increased population of smaller fish lead to? decreased producers decreased primary consumers decreased secondary consumers increased producers increased primary consumers

The two possible consequences are increased producers and increased primary consumers for an increased population of smaller fish. If the population of smaller fish is increased, the population of primary consumers will increase by 10 times of smaller fish and producers will increase by 10 times of primary consumers.

"1. it should be, it has been for about 20 years, and it's really not much different in the end than breeding animals to have particular traits. there are always concerns about genetically engineered animals/plants affecting the environment in unexpected negative ways, but i can't think of an example where the fears didn't turn out to be baseless.  

first, as you point out, it would be a great advance in pharmacology, to be able to tailor drugs and their doses to me. the pros involve better medical treatment. the cons involve privacy issues like insurance companies denying coverage to people with genetic risk factors. looking at dna markers wouldn't affect the frequency of genetic diseases, but it would allow detection of them earlier. and ok, actually i suppose that if people used this information to avoid having children with genetic diseases, some might decrease in frequency."