Some say the precautionary principle is analogous to the judicial concept "guilty until proven innocent ." In the United States , one is " innocent until proven guilty " in the court system . Do you think regulators in the United States should apply the precautionary principle to chemicals for which toxicity levels have not been determined ? Explain your reasoning.

plant because they survive by water, sunlight, ex.

explanation:

"1. it should be, it has been for about 20 years, and it's really not much different in the end than breeding animals to have particular traits. there are always concerns about genetically engineered animals/plants affecting the environment in unexpected negative ways, but i can't think of an example where the fears didn't turn out to be baseless.  

first, as you point out, it would be a great advance in pharmacology, to be able to tailor drugs and their doses to me. the pros involve better medical treatment. the cons involve privacy issues like insurance companies denying coverage to people with genetic risk factors. looking at dna markers wouldn't affect the frequency of genetic diseases, but it would allow detection of them earlier. and ok, actually i suppose that if people used this information to avoid having children with genetic diseases, some might decrease in frequency."

lipid

explanation: