Paramore’s use of language, word choice, and phrasing that would influence readers to be suspicious of biometric monitoring. How does this language make the essay more or less effective or convincing?

Parramore used made the essay more convincing because it made the reader feel as if it was something they already knew was bad.

Explanation:

Throughout the essay the words and language that Parramore used made the essay more convincing because it made the reader feel as if it was something they already knew was bad. For example she says in page 32-33 “Surveillance has a way of dehumanizing workers.” which is very convincing when the reader reads

they have a third less land and than the rest of china