A. s.a. will mark as the industrial revolution produced both positive and negative results. the greatest positive result was that it made many goods more plentiful. this availability, in turn, made the goods cheaper. factories also created jobs for many people. even though most of these jobs did not pay well, many people moved to the cities to work. unfortunately, this led to overcrowding. equally unfortunately, the same factories that produced jobs also produced pollution. how would this paragraph be useful to someone gathering evidence for an argumentative essay on the industrial revolution? a. it would the writer decide on a topic. b. it would the writer form a central claim. c. it would the writer revise a final draft. d. it would the writer create a first draft.

According to the graph above, in which location(s) do at least half of people practice christianity? a. zimbabwe only b. nigeria and mali only c. zimbabwe and south africa only d. zimbabwe, nigeria, and south africa only

Explain in detail the events that led to the fall of the soviet union. explain the importance of the foreign policy shift from brinkmanship to détente during the cold war.be sure to include evidence to support your answer describe the challenges to nation-building that exist in africa today .

Adefendant visited her doctor to seek treatment for a bullet wound. while he was treating the wound, the doctor asked the defendant how she was shot. the defendant replied that she was struck by a police officer’s bullet while running away from a jewelry store she had robbed, but she implored the doctor not to tell this to anyone. the doctor promised that he would not. although the defendant was never charged by the police, the owner of the jewelry store brought suit against her seeking the value of the stolen goods. the defendant denied robbing the store. at the trial, the owner calls the doctor to testify to the statement made to him by the defendant. the defense attorney objects on the ground that such testimony is barred by the jurisdiction’s physician-patient privilege. should the objection be sustained?