5–1. product liability. carmen buys a television set manufactured by aki electronics. she is going on vacation, so she takes the set to her mother's house for her mother to use. because the set is defective, it explodes, causing considerable damage to her mother's house. carmen's mother sues aki for the damage to her house. discuss the theories under which carmen's mother can recover from aki.

The cases would be against AKI for the breach of the guarantee of the TV. The reality the TV was on while her mom was watching it is something that could have happened anyplace the TV was at. The way that her mom was harmed would be sensibly obligated as she could have been harmed any place the television was utilized. The producer would be obligated for flawed make on item threat since it put in showcase a flawed item. I trust she would win the case. Harms that would be given to her would be the costs to get her home settled and any therapeutic costs she brought about while being dealt with for her wounds.

so, colonists did not want to pay any taxes.  

colonists did not consider themselves british citizens.  

colonists felt no sense of obligation to britain.  

colonists objected to violations of their natural rights. are the answer choices?