Social Studies, 29.07.2019 01:30 tannercarr7428

What are the ideal types of social stratification and how do they differ? which one, in your own opinion, best describes stratification in the united states?

Answers: 1

Show answers

Answers

1. -. Estate System - Social stratification that's based on political power, has limited social mobility
- . Caste System - Social stratification based on race/religion, no chance of social mobility
. Class System -Social stratification based on economic power, had loose social mobility
p Status Hierarchy System - social stratification based on other people's acknowledgement, had very loose social mobility.

2. United states is considered as Class stratification.
In united states people who held economic power could also obtained other type of power that would strengthen their position in society. (such as giving funding to candidates in order to obtain political power, use the wealth to gain fame and status, etc,)

Answer from: Quest

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write

explanation:

Answer from: Quest

this is a pretty broad question and can be a pretty lengthy answer. since 1900, women have gained a lot more rights and have become active in the workforce. with women being in the workforce, men play a larger role in family life. many family tasks are shared between men and women, whereas, women used to be the sole family caretakers.

that should get you started at least.

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 16:10

Which best explains why the supreme court’s decision in plessy v. ferguson was unconstitutional? the supreme court’s ruling allowed states to deny equal protection to any person within its jurisdiction. since the 14th amendment did not make concessions for people born outside the us, the supreme court’s decision could not be applied. the supreme court’s decision gave individual states the freedom to make their own laws in relation to non-whites. since segregation laws did not provide equal protections or liberties to non-whites, the ruling was not consistent with the 14th amendment.

Answers: 3

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 20:30

Me and i you plus a 5 stars and brainlist

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 07:30

Recall that in one condition of the experiment conducted by stasser and titus (1985) about student council president candidates, all group members had access to the same information, and that in another condition, members had unique information that other group members didn't know. in the second (unshared information) condition, the group made a worse decision than in the first (shared information) condition. this occurred because groups seldom can agree on who is most expert. focus discussion on the information that all members know. often ignore dissenting opinions. avoid differences of opinion, given conformity pressures.

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 11:10

Aguiding principle of the national response framework is that: a. response partners use nonstandard structures to allow for flexible and scalable responses. b. unity of effort results when responding agencies are willing to relinquish their authorities. c. effective partnership relies on engaging all elements of the whole community. d. readiness to act encourages response partners to self-dispatch to an incident scene.

Answers: 3

Answer

You know the right answer?

What are the ideal types of social stratification and how do they differ? which one, in your own op...

Questions