Four-year-old kanaan's mother makes him a ham and cheese sandwich for lunch. however, kanaan refuses to eat the sandwich, stating that he does "not like cheese." when kanaan's mother removes the cheese from the sandwich, he still refuses to eat and again states that he does "not like cheese." this is an example of

A. in weeks v. united states (1914), the court established the exclusionary rule, which was incorporated to the states in mapp v. ohio (1961), and the court established the concept of a "good faith exception" to the exclusionary rule in united states v. leon (1984). in their opinion, the supreme court pointed out that compliance with the exclusionary rule can have a cost to society (criminals can go free) that outweighs the benefits (stopping illegal searches by police). ultimately, the court determined that despite the exclusionary rule, evidence can still be admitted in situations where police made genuine "good faith" efforts to act legally, but technically acted illegally, in obtaining the evidence. explain the exclusionary rule good faith exception and explain and support whether you agree or disagree with the concept of a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule? why or why not? use the lesson notes and/or one news source to support your answer.

In russia, after the soviet union collapse, influential retained power by acquiring large numbers of , so the ruling class gained power in place of power.

Recently, there has been pressure to loosen clean air standards. use economic arguments to support or oppose this proposed action.