2) which of the following is the correct description of a logic bomb? a) a logic bomb physically destroys the hardware in computer networks b) a logic bomb attacks a useful and authorized program on a user's computer c) a logic bomb allows cyber terrorist to covertly use computers belonging to other users in cyber attacks d) a logic bomb destroys all of the data on a disk by reformatting the hard drive or randomly inserting "garbage" into files, making them inaccessible 3) the difference between a cyber criminal and a cyber terrorist is that a) criminals view hacking into and attacking a computer system as a challenge to meet rather than use these skills to disrupt infrastructure that affects the economic growth of the world b) terrorist do not use the same techniques and tools to hack into computer networks as criminals c) criminals are motivated to destroy financial and other infrastructure data, whereas terrorist only seek to manipulate these data d) criminals are focused on specific types of technology hardware and software infiltration, whereas terrorist seek to disrupt all forms of technology

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation:

ever since wwii tmthey always did hated each other.