Help me quickly pls if u can

You are a member of the jury for a murder case. the prosecution has presented dna evidence linking the defendant to the crime scene. the defense claims that dna evidence using str analysis with 13 markers is not sufficient to reliably distinguish between people. what do you think? a. the defense is right. str analysis with 13 markers gives a 1 in 1 million chance of two people having the same pattern, leaving a reasonable doubt. b. str analysis is not sufficient. the defendant's entire genome should be sequenced. the prosecution will have to consult a genomic library to make sure their dna evidence is valid. c. the prosecution is right. str analysis with 13 markers gives a 1 in 10 billion or greater chance that two people will have the same pattern. this person was at the crime scene. d. dna evidence is not generally accepted by legal experts.

Tanya was used to using word, and she did some work for her brother mike, who was using wordperfect. tanya was quickly able to use wordperfect for windows with little difficulty, since many of the commands for it were the same as the commands for word. tanya's ability to use wordperfect best illustrates:

What would be the most relevant question to ask to find out why tutankhamen died? what was tutankhamen’s age when he died? was a doctor with tutankhamen at his death? why was tutankhamen mummified after his death? did tutankhamen’s body have evidence of disease?